Free Whitepapers
May 31 2008 > Feature
Email To A Friend  Email  |  Printable Version  Print

The next big innovation in ready to drink beverages

By Matt Casey


The next big innovation in ready to drink beverages might not come in the bottle, but in the cap - at least if a handful of relatively new industry players have anything to say about it.

While it may seem counter-intuitive for beverage companies to ask consumers to mix their own drinks, delivery caps could fit comfortably into the industry’s trend toward new packaging ideas. Fuze recently added plastic bottles to its traditionally all-glass line to improve portability; Fiji aims to reduce the PET in its bottles by 20 percent to bolster its environmental credentials, and Jolt rolled out a battery-shaped can to have a little fun with the brand’s image. 

In that environment, beverage companies may be wise to take a look at delivery caps. New technology automatically brings the “wow” factor with it and there’s something mesmerizing about watching colored powder disperse into liquid. But Ken Milligan, executive vice president of New Hampshire-based Liquid Health Labs, said the caps’ benefits extend beyond novelty.

Milligan said shipping the ingredients “ready to go” in the top of the bottle can save both energy and packaging. Bottlers don’t have to mix the beverages in house, he said, which saves them the energy of the hot-fill process, and skipping the boil also saves ingredients – none cook off – and means that co-packers can use lighter (and cheaper) cold-fill bottles.

The caps could also open the door for beverage companies to delve deeper into nutritional additives, according to Marco Saulle, director of marketing, research and design for Liteco. Saulle said many ingredients degrade in water – some at a rapid pace – and delivery caps aren’t anything new. “The concept of keeping ingredients separate has been widely used here in Italy for royal jelly, ginseng and vitamins,” Saulle said, “all those products that would become unstable or lose their potency.

”That concept never made the jump to the beverage industry, Saulle said, due to cost of the caps and the industry’s lack of interest in volatile ingredients. But today, more and more consumers are putting down their cans of Coke and Pepsi in favor of beverages that may provide real health benefits. That pushes beverage companies to consider ingredients ranging from vitamins to pantothenic acid – but not everything plays well with water. Some vitamins have been shown to degrade over time, and some ingredients fall out of H20, leaving you with a layer of grit at the bottom of the container.

That conflict between functionality and shelf stability has long intrigued Blast Cap Founder and President Michael Anderson. “I was always challenged with trying to add ingredients (while) trying to have that long shelf life,” Anderson said. Anderson devised a solution that replicated the tactics of Italian pharmacy brands: if you keep the volatile ingredients dry and separate, the beverage can achieve a long shelf life and maintain its functionality. Anders Eisner highlighted the latter benefit when he launched Activate – the first product using a delivery cap to reach the retail market.

Eisner’s four variety line of vitamin-enhanced water uses Liquid Health Labs’ PowerCap to store and deliver the drink’s ingredients Eisner – son of former Disney Chairman and CEO Michael Eisner – said his company would target high-end grocery stores and liquor stores in the Los Angeles area, and use in-store demos to introduce customers to the product, but some of those customers may already understand the concept.

While Activate is the first delivery cap product on shelves, it isn’t the first product using the caps to make it to market. BPI Worldwide, a multi-level marketing company, launched two flavors of stand-alone PowerCaps last October. Customers buy the caps, affix them to their own water bottle, and then release the ingredients and drink. Similar independent caps will make it to shelves this year, Milligan said, when a company called IV Science launches standalone caps for retail distribution under the brand names Aqua Thin, Aqua Surge and Aqua Essentials. That stand-alone potential, Milligan said, may offer consumers an additional measure of control over their beverages.

Milligan said powder mixes will be formulated for a specific volume of water, but consumers would be under no obligation to use that amount. If they prefer a stronger-tasting beverage, they can use a smaller bottle. If they prefer something more subtle, they can use a larger bottle.

Email To A Friend  Email  |  Printable Version  Print
2 Next >> 
There are currently 1 comments on this article
On 6/18/2008, Marco Saulle said:

In Regards to the Liteco''s injunction mentioned on the hardcopy and PDF file of BEVNET-INNOVATION Liteco''s patents don''t interfere with anybody as the judge communicated on an order dated august 2007. What Happened... The U.S patents office issued three patents on the same invention one to Liteco and two to Anderson. In all three patent filing applications the same exact design is used as a reference to describe the invention. HMMMM?? Liteco''s srl infrastructure has been on the market for over 36 years and since 1998 diversifying in the health industry in R&D product development and commercialization of private label products as proven on many diversified sport industry magazine ads here in Italy. Well Liteco was first to file the patent of the Instantmixercap. FOUR MONTHS later Michael Anderson filed for a Patent on the same Application. Michael Anderson received samples from Liteco right after our filings, thats why the designs on Andersons patent filings are identical. Liteco claims international priority as the international convention rules out. Anderson sued Liteco srl because Anderson could not close deals, because Liteco''s Patent claimed international priority as it still does today. The second point is that all the samples that I''ve sent to everybody all around the world including the ones that I sent to Anderson are exclusively for demo and do not utilize barrier polymers that would give ideal stability properties of the mixercap. We never issued to Anybody the real barrierized Mixercaps. It is very possible that many labs around the world have tested our and Andersons mixercap properties finding that the chamber concept had no efficacy in preserving the ingredients. This is the reason why we haven''t still hit the market. The Good news is that once Again liteco will prove to be one step ahead. As we are currently testing for stability and will have results in the following weeks. In regards to the lawsuit: In August 2007 the judge ordered there was no interference. The plaintiff sued Liteco saying that liteco''s Patent filed first and claiming international priority, interfered on the plaintiff''s Patents whom were filed after. HMMMMM??? After spending over $120.000 in defending in a ridiculous and frivilous lawsuit with no case we were forced to retire from defense cause of the expense and because there was no interference. Anderson asked for a default judgement and got the judge of the Federal Court of Southern District of Florida to give us an injunction limited exclusively to the United States territory where Liteco cannot sell the patent in suit cause it interferes with Andersons which was filed after..HMMMM? The Court never communicated to Liteco the date for hearing nor the order; we have written confession from the court where it was admitted that nobody communicated to us the date to be in court. STRANGE HMMMMMMM? So we are 6000 KM away... We continue to claim international priority and to regain our rights..mean while... we Rule out side of the United States. And since we did all the inventing the injunction is not a problem cause we created other mixercaps that are out of the injunction and so we will continue to promote other types of mixercaps in the United States. I advise everybody not to sign any non-disclosure agreements which could block you from changing cap technology in the future. Don''t put any money upfront and before you do.. get samples and get them tested for humidity and oxygen barrier in an independent laboratory. Don''t be fooled like me. Kind Regards, Marco Saulle Liteco srl - Italy

Leave a Comment
 Name (required)  
 Email (required but will not be published)  
Please note: All comments are reviewed prior to posting. Attempts to advertise, solicit, or promote will not be approved.